Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 718
Filtrar
1.
Nature ; 608(7921): 80-86, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35922501

RESUMO

Risk management has reduced vulnerability to floods and droughts globally1,2, yet their impacts are still increasing3. An improved understanding of the causes of changing impacts is therefore needed, but has been hampered by a lack of empirical data4,5. On the basis of a global dataset of 45 pairs of events that occurred within the same area, we show that risk management generally reduces the impacts of floods and droughts but faces difficulties in reducing the impacts of unprecedented events of a magnitude not previously experienced. If the second event was much more hazardous than the first, its impact was almost always higher. This is because management was not designed to deal with such extreme events: for example, they exceeded the design levels of levees and reservoirs. In two success stories, the impact of the second, more hazardous, event was lower, as a result of improved risk management governance and high investment in integrated management. The observed difficulty of managing unprecedented events is alarming, given that more extreme hydrological events are projected owing to climate change3.


Assuntos
Secas , Clima Extremo , Inundações , Gestão de Riscos , Mudança Climática/estatística & dados numéricos , Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto , Secas/prevenção & controle , Secas/estatística & dados numéricos , Inundações/prevenção & controle , Inundações/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hidrologia , Internacionalidade , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Riscos/tendências
3.
Emerg Med J ; 38(11): 814-819, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34373266

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The History, ECG, Age, Risk Factors and Troponin (HEART) Score is a decision support tool applied by physicians in the emergency department developed to risk stratify low-risk patients presenting with chest pain. We assessed the potential value of this tool in prehospital setting, when applied by emergency medical services (EMS), and derived and validated a tool adapted to the prehospital setting in order to determine if it could assist with decisions regarding conveyance to a hospital. METHODS: In 2017, EMS personnel prospectively determined the HEART Score, including point-of-care (POC) troponin measurements, in patients presenting with chest pain, in the north of the Netherlands. The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiac event (MACE), consisting of acute myocardial infarction or death, within 3 days. The components of the HEART Score were evaluated for their discriminatory value, cut-offs were calibrated for the prehospital setting and sex was substituted for cardiac risk factors to develop a prehospital HEART (preHEART) Score. This score was validated in an independent prospective cohort of 435 patients in 2018. RESULTS: Among 1208 patients prospectively recruited in the first cohort, 123 patients (10.2%) developed a MACE. The HEART Score had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98.4% (96.4-99.3), a positive predictive value (PPV) of 35.5% (31.8-39.3) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.81 (0.78-0.85). The preHEART Score had an NPV of 99.3% (98.1-99.8), a PPV of 49.4% (42.0-56.9) and an AUC of 0.85 (0.82-0.88), outperforming the HEART Score or POC troponin measurements on their own. Similar results were found in a validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The HEART Score can be used in the prehospital setting to assist with conveyance decisions and choice of hospitals; however, the preHEART Score outperforms both the HEART Score and single POC troponin measurements when applied by EMS personnel in the prehospital setting.


Assuntos
Dor no Peito/terapia , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Dor no Peito/complicações , Dor no Peito/epidemiologia , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/organização & administração , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Curva ROC , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos
4.
J Safety Res ; 77: 139-150, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34092304

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The construction industry in Malaysia has been bedevilled by myriads of risk issues that have hampered its smooth operations in recent times. This paper is an empirical assessment that aims to examine the effect of coercive pressure on the relationship between organizational structure and construction risk management among construction industry in Malaysia. METHOD: Based on the proposed model, a quantitative method was employed to obtain data from G7 construction industry operating within the peninsular Malaysia. Out of the 180 copies of questionnaire, 165 copies were properly filled, returned, and used for the analysis. PLS-SEM was used to analyze the obtained data. RESULTS: The findings of the study affirmed that specialization, centralization, and management of risk by the construction industry had positive correlation. CONCLUSIONS: As anticipated, coercive pressure had positive moderating correlation with both formalization and the management of risk by the construction industry. Similarly, it was also found that in the course of carrying out construction activities, coercive pressure made significant interactive influence on formalization, specialization, and centralization. Practical Applications: Coercive pressure reduced the frequency of accidents among workers in the process of carrying out construction works.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trabalho/estatística & dados numéricos , Indústria da Construção/organização & administração , Saúde Ocupacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Indústria da Construção/estatística & dados numéricos , Malásia , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração
5.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34077339

RESUMO

Probabilistic exposure and risk assessment of chemical hazards in the diet have increasingly gained ground in recent years as a pragmatic approach for the approximation of reality. This work presents the outcomes of a project which aimed at applying probabilistic techniques for basic modelling of chronic dietary exposure to food contaminants following EFSA guidance. These techniques, based on Monte Carlo Risk Assessment (MCRA) software and on the programming language R, were employed for the risk assessment of cadmium for Austrian adults, enabling the validation and the critical comparison of the two approaches. Harmonisation and optimisation of procedures, refinement of exposure assessment skills and confidence in the results were the main benefits. Data amount and validity were identified as critical parameters, influencing the precision of the results. Cadmium was selected as a case study due to its toxicological properties, its ubiquitous presence in food and the availability of Austrian occurrence data. Similar exposure and risk estimates were generated through MCRA and R in alternative optimistic and pessimistic exposure scenarios, suggesting low levels of concern, except for vegetarians, whose upper tail exposures are close to the established Tolerable Weekly Intake. However, as occurrence data gaps have been identified as the major element of uncertainty, the estimated exposure and risk levels are characterised as underestimated. Grains and grain-based products, potatoes and leafy vegetables are the main contributors to the intake. The results will contribute to risk management and to a future refinement of the assessment.


Assuntos
Cádmio/efeitos adversos , Exposição Dietética/estatística & dados numéricos , Contaminação de Alimentos/análise , Medição de Risco/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Áustria , Dieta/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição Dietética/efeitos adversos , Grão Comestível/química , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Estatísticos , Método de Monte Carlo , Vigilância da População , Software , Solanum tuberosum/química , Verduras/química
8.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 320, 2021 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33888075

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal mortality in low-income countries, and is the most common direct cause of maternal deaths in Madagascar. Studies in Madagascar and other low-income countries observe low provider adherence to recommended practices for PPH prevention and treatment. Our study addresses gaps in the literature by applying a behavioral science lens to identify barriers inhibiting facility-based providers' consistent following of PPH best practices in Madagascar. METHODS: In June 2019, we undertook a cross-sectional qualitative research study in peri-urban and rural areas of the Vatovavy-Fitovinany region of Madagascar. We conducted 47 in-depth interviews in 19 facilities and five communities, with facility-based healthcare providers, postpartum women, medical supervisors, community health volunteers, and traditional birth attendants, and conducted thematic analysis of the transcripts. RESULTS: We identified seven key behavioral insights representing a range of factors that may contribute to delays in appropriate PPH management in these settings. Findings suggest providers' perceived low risk of PPH may influence their compliance with best practices, subconsciously or explicitly, and lead them to undervalue the importance of PPH prevention and monitoring measures. Providers lack clear feedback on specific components of their performance, which ultimately inhibits continuous improvement of compliance with best practices. Providers demonstrate great resourcefulness while operating in a challenging context with limited equipment, supplies, and support; however, overcoming these challenges remains their foremost concern. This response to chronic scarcity is cognitively taxing and may ultimately affect clinical decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals how perception of low risk of PPH, limited feedback on compliance with best practices and consequences of current practices, and a context of scarcity may negatively affect provider decision-making and clinical practices. Behaviorally informed interventions, designed for specific contexts that care providers operate in, can help improve quality of care and health outcomes for women in labor and childbirth.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Clínicos/normas , Serviços de Saúde Materna , Hemorragia Pós-Parto , Gestão de Riscos , Adulto , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Madagáscar/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde Materna/normas , Serviços de Saúde Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade Materna , Tocologia , Preferência do Paciente , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/mortalidade , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/prevenção & controle , Hemorragia Pós-Parto/terapia , Gravidez , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Percepção Social , Tempo para o Tratamento/normas , Tempo para o Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos
9.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 209(4): 307-310, 2021 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33764956

RESUMO

ABSTRACT: Violence is a serious concern in the psychiatric inpatient and emergency setting. Much of the research on victims of inpatient violence has focused on identifying and supporting staff who are at risk of being victimized when working in psychiatric settings. This article presents an analysis of 72 patients who were targeted during incidents of patient-on-patient physical aggression in hospital-based psychiatric settings (both inpatient and emergency) from 2014 to 2018. Results suggest that patients who are at risk of being targeted by another patient while in the hospital tend to be younger, are more likely to be male, and present with manic symptoms and recent cannabis use. These variables have all been identified as risk factors for perpetration of violence by patients with mental illness. This study adds to a literature demonstrating a consistent overlap between individuals with mental illness who are victimized and those who initiate violence.


Assuntos
Hospitais Psiquiátricos , Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores Sexuais , Violência/psicologia
10.
Aerosp Med Hum Perform ; 92(2): 127-128, 2021 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33468295

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Noninferiority or equivalence testing are often used when comparing a novel pharmaceutical, operation, or procedure to the current standard designated as safe. Noninferiority and equivalence testing require estimates of a metric called delta: the margin of meaningful difference. Inappropriate delta margins can lead to invalid conclusions, thereby creating uncertainty about a studys scientific credibility. We recommend that a working group be convened with the following goals: 1) to evaluate delta values currently in use in aviation; 2) to determine if it is possible to develop a systematic, evidence-based, and replicable process to derive delta values based on statistical properties from population data, rather than a mixture of evidence- and opinion-based processes; and 3) based on the findings of the second goal, update the current delta values in use in aviation. This working group should include, at a minimum, government agencies and other key stakeholders using these values within operational settings.Lamp ACM, Rempe MJ, Belenky GL. Delta: the value that matters in fatigue risk management. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(2):127128.


Assuntos
Aviação/estatística & dados numéricos , Fadiga , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão da Segurança , Humanos
11.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 21(1): 8, 2021 01 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33413123

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient safety incident (PSI) reporting has been an important means of improving patient safety and enhancing organizational quality control. Reports of anesthesia-related incidents are of great value for analysis to improve perioperative patient safety. However, the utilization of incident data is far from sufficient, especially in developing countries such as China. METHODS: All PSIs reported by anesthesiologists in a Chinese academic hospital between September 2009 and August 2019 were collected from the incident reporting system. We reviewed the freeform text reports, supplemented with information from the patient medical record system. Composition analysis and risk assessment were performed. RESULTS: In total, 847 PSIs were voluntarily reported by anesthesiologists during the study period among 452,974 anesthetic procedures, with a reported incidence of 0.17%. Patients with a worse ASA physical status were more likely to be involved in a PSI. The most common type of incident was related to the airway (N = 208, 27%), followed by the heart, brain and vascular system (N = 99, 13%) and pharmacological incidents (N = 79, 10%). Those preventable incidents with extreme or high risk were identified through risk assessment to serve as a reference for the implementation of more standard operating procedures by the department. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the characteristics of 847 PSIs voluntarily reported by anesthesiologists within eleven years in a Chinese academic hospital. Airway incidents constitute the majority of incidents reported by anesthesiologists. Underreporting is common in China, and the importance of summarizing and utilizing anesthesia incident data should be scrutinized.


Assuntos
Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Anestesiologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perioperatória/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Anestesia/métodos , China , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Adulto Jovem
12.
J Healthc Risk Manag ; 40(4): 46-57, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33496013

RESUMO

Health care organizations have had to respond to the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in unprecedented ways. In the United States, where health risk management is an established profession, health care risk managers (HRMs) contributed to the response by supporting organizations and frontline workers. HRMs advised administrative and clinical leadership on decisions and policies aimed at addressing the medico legal, ethical, and operational dilemmas raised by this public health emergency. This article describes these challenges from the perspective of a New York City (NYC) public hospital located in the "epicenter within the epicenter" of the pandemic and aims to provide practical guidance for HRMs on the front lines of this crisis.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Política de Saúde , Hospitais Públicos/normas , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Política Pública , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , SARS-CoV-2
13.
J Healthc Risk Manag ; 40(4): 30-37, 2021 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33410212

RESUMO

On March 11, 2020, the novel coronavirus disease, COVID-19, was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO).1 The pandemic evolved rapidly, forcing providers to face previously unconsidered health care delivery scenarios. Medical and dental professionals sought guidance. This article presents an overview of the questions, concerns, and requests physicians and dentists shared with patient safety risk management consultants (PSRMs) at a large medical professional liability company. During the first 5 months of the pandemic, PSRMs handled more than 1200 calls related to COVID-19. Analysis of call data provides insight into front line provider concerns as the pandemic evolved.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos , Segurança do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
14.
Acta Radiol ; 62(5): 653-666, 2021 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32600067

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient safety incidents may be a valuable source of information to learn from and to prevent future errors. PURPOSE: To determine the distribution of patient safety incident types in radiology according to the International Classification for Patient Safety (ICPS), and to comprehensively review those incidents that were either harmful or serious in terms of risk of patient harm and reoccurrence. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The most recent five-year database (2014-2019) of a radiology incident reporting system was evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 480 patient safety incidents were included. Top three ICPS incident types were clinical administration (119/480, 24.8%), resources/organizational management (112/480, 23.3%), and clinical process/procedure (91/480, 19.0%). Harm severities were none in 457 (95.2%) cases, mild in 14 (2.9%), moderate in 4 (0.8%), severe in 3 (0.6%), and unknown in one case. Subsequent Prevention Recovery Information System for Monitoring and Analysis (PRISMA) reviews were performed in 4 (0.8%) cases. The three patient safety incidents that caused severe harm (of which one underwent PRISMA review) involved resources/organizational management (n = 1), clinical process/procedure (n = 1), and medication/IV fluids (n = 1). Three other cases (with no harm in two cases and moderate harm in one case) that underwent PRISMA review involved resources/organizational management (n = 2) and medical device/equipment/property (n = 1). CONCLUSION: Radiology-related patient safety incidents predominantly occur in three ICPS domains (clinical administration, resources/organizational management, and clinical process/procedure). Harmful/serious incidents are relatively rare. The standardly and transparently reported findings from this study may be used for healthcare quality improvement, benchmarking purposes, and as a primer for future studies.


Assuntos
Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Segurança do Paciente , Radiografia/efeitos adversos , Radiologia , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Gestão de Riscos/classificação
15.
Brachytherapy ; 19(6): 762-766, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32952055

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Safe delivery of brachytherapy and establishing a safety culture are critical in high-quality brachytherapy. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) Quality and Safety Committee surveyed members regarding brachytherapy services offered, safety practices during treatment, quality assurance procedures, and needs to develop safety and training materials. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 22-item survey was sent to ABS membership in early 2019 to physicians, physicists, therapists, nurses, and administrators. Participation was voluntary. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics and relative frequency distributions. RESULTS: There were 103 unique responses. Approximately one in three was attending physicians and one in three attending physicists. Most were in practice >10 years. A total of 94% and 50% performed gynecologic and prostate brachytherapy, respectively. Ninety-one percent performed two-identification patient verification before treatment. Eighty-six percent performed a time-out. Ninety-five percent had an incident reporting or learning system, but only 71% regularly reviewed incidents. Half reviewed safety practices within the last year. Twenty percent reported they were somewhat or not satisfied with department safety culture, but 92% of respondents were interested in improving safety culture. Most reported time, communication, and staffing as barriers to improving safety. Most respondents desired safety-oriented webinars, self-assessment modules, learning modules, or checklists endorsed by the ABS to improve safety practice. CONCLUSIONS: Most but not all practices use standards and quality assurance procedures in line with society recommendations. There is a need to heighten safety culture at many departments and to shift resources (e.g., time or staffing) to improve safety practice. There is a desire for society guidance to improve brachytherapy safety practices. This is the first survey to assess safety practice patterns among a national sample of radiation oncologists with expertise in brachytherapy.


Assuntos
Braquiterapia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/radioterapia , Segurança do Paciente , Neoplasias da Próstata/radioterapia , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/organização & administração , Braquiterapia/efeitos adversos , Braquiterapia/normas , Lista de Checagem , Comunicação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Cultura Organizacional , Sistemas de Identificação de Pacientes/estatística & dados numéricos , Admissão e Escalonamento de Pessoal , Melhoria de Qualidade , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
16.
BMC Public Health ; 20(1): 1288, 2020 Aug 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32843008

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: It is important to understand how HIV infection is transmitted in the population in order to guide prevention activities and properly allocate limited resources. In Ukraine and other countries where injecting drug use and homosexuality are stigmatized, the information about mode of transmission in case registration systems is often biased. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey in a random sample of patients registered at HIV clinics in seven regions of Ukraine in 2013-2015. The survey assessed behavioral risk factors and serological markers of viral hepatitis B and C. We analyzed the discrepancies between the registered mode of transmission and the survey data, and evaluated trends over 3 years. RESULTS: Of 2285 participants, 1032 (45.2%) were females. The proportion of new HIV cases likely caused by injecting drug use based on the survey data was 59.7% compared to 33.2% in official reporting, and proportion of cases likely acquired through homosexual transmission was 3.8% compared to 2.8%. We found a significant decrease from 63.2 to 57.5% in the proportion of injecting drug use-related cases and a steep increase from 2.5 to 5.2% in homosexual transmission over 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The study confirmed the significant degree of misclassification of HIV mode of transmission among registered cases. The role of injecting drug use in HIV transmission is gradually decreasing, but remains high. The proportion of cases related to homosexual transmission is relatively modest, but is rapidly increasing, especially in younger men. Improvements in ascertaining the risk factor information are essential to monitor the epidemic and to guide programmatic response.


Assuntos
Usuários de Drogas/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por HIV/epidemiologia , Infecções por HIV/transmissão , Vigilância da População , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Minorias Sexuais e de Gênero/estatística & dados numéricos , Abuso de Substâncias por Via Intravenosa/epidemiologia , Adulto , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco , Ucrânia/epidemiologia
17.
West J Emerg Med ; 21(4): 900-905, 2020 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32726262

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare systems often expose patients to significant, preventable harm causing an estimated 44,000 to 98,000 deaths or more annually. This has propelled patient safety to the forefront, with reporting systems allowing for the review of local events to determine their root causes. As residents engage in a substantial amount of patient care in academic emergency departments, it is critical to use these safety event reports for resident-focused interventions and educational initiatives. This study analyzes reports from the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System to understand how the reports are categorized and how it relates to opportunities for resident education. METHODS: Identifying categories from the literature, three subject matter experts (attending physician, nursing director, registered nurse) categorized an initial 20 reports to resolve category gaps and then 100 reports to determine inter-rater reliability. Given sufficient agreement, the remaining 400 reports were coded individually for type of event and education among other categories. RESULTS: After reviewing 513 events, we found that the most common event types were issues related to staff and resident training (25%) and communication (18%), with 31% requiring no education, 46% requiring directed educational feedback to an individual or group, 20% requiring education through monthly safety updates or meetings, 3% requiring urgent communication by email or in-person, and <1% requiring simulation. CONCLUSION: Twenty years after the publication of To Err is Human, gains have been made integrating quality assurance and patient safety within medical education and hospital systems, but there remains extensive work to be done. Through a review and analysis of our patient safety event reporting system, we were able to gain a better understanding of the events that are submitted, including the types of events and their severity, and how these relate to the types of educational interventions provided (eg, feedback, simulation). We also determined that these events can help inform resident education and learning using various types of education. Additionally, incorporating residents in the review process, such as through root cause analyses, can provide residents with high-quality, engaging learning opportunities and useful, lifelong skills, which is invaluable to our learners and future physicians.


Assuntos
Medicina de Emergência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Internato e Residência/métodos , Segurança do Paciente , Gestão de Riscos , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Medicina de Emergência/métodos , Humanos , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão da Segurança/métodos , Gestão da Segurança/organização & administração , Virginia
18.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 49(5): 464-474, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32726581

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To understand the opinions of clinicians about the risks, benefits, barriers, and facilitators to the practice of parent sleep during skin-to-skin care in hospital settings. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Clinicians who self-identified as infant care providers, that is, neonatal clinicians (N = 158). METHODS: We sent an online survey invitation to neonatal clinicians through neonatal websites, conferences, and social media sites in the United States and used snowball recruitment. We used a risk management framework to analyze qualitative data. We used descriptive statistics and the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests to determine if opinions differed based on clinician and organizational characteristics. RESULTS: Respondents' support of parent sleep during skin-to-skin care (yes/no) did not differ on the basis of whether the clinician had taken a formal course on skin-to-skin care, facilitated skin-to-skin care more than 100 times, or frequently promoted skin-to-skin care in current practice. Respondents who supported parent sleep (n = 93, 59% of respondents) reported greater implementation of risk control strategies than nonsupporters (n = 53 [57%] vs. n = 3 [5%]; p < .001), such as frequent monitoring of vital signs (n = 33 [35%] vs. n = 2 [3%]; p < .001), use of devices to support skin-to-skin care (n = 49 [53%] vs. n = 19 [29%]; p = .003), and proper positioning (n = 20 [22%] vs. n = 0 [0%]; p < .001). Nonsupporters more frequently reported that parent sleep during skin-to-skin care violates safe sleep recommendations, is habit forming for home, poses a fall risk, and jeopardizes the infant's airway. CONCLUSION: Most respondents supported parent sleep during skin-to-skin care, but concerns regarding safety for the infant remained a barrier. The use of a risk management framework may help facilitate a systematic approach to improve the implementation of safe skin-to-skin practices.


Assuntos
Método Canguru/normas , Posicionamento do Paciente/normas , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Sono/fisiologia , Estudos Transversais , Prova Pericial/métodos , Humanos , Método Canguru/métodos , Método Canguru/estatística & dados numéricos , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Posicionamento do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos
19.
BMJ Open Qual ; 9(2)2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32601176

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prescribing errors are a principal cause of preventable harm in healthcare. This study aims to establish a systematic approach to analysing prescribing-related adverse incident reports, in order to elucidate the characteristics and contributing factors of common prescribing errors and target multifaceted quality improvement initiatives. METHODS: All prescribing-related adverse incident reports submitted across one NHS board over 12 months were selected. Incidents involving commonly implicated drugs (involved in ≥10 incidents) underwent analysis to establish likely underlying causes using Reason's Model of Accident Causation. RESULTS: 330 prescribing-related adverse incident reports were identified. Commonly implicated drugs were insulin (10% of incidents), gentamicin (7%), co-amoxiclav (5%) and amoxicillin (5%). The most prevalent error types were prescribing amoxicillin when contraindicated due to allergy (5%); prescribing co-amoxiclav when contraindicated due to allergy (5%); prescribing the incorrect type of insulin (3%); and omitting to prescribe insulin (3%). Error-producing factors were identified in 86% of incidents involving commonly implicated drugs. 53% of incidents involved error-producing factors related to the working environment; 38% involved factors related to the healthcare team; and 37% involved factors related to the prescriber. DISCUSSION: This study establishes that systematic analysis of adverse incident reports can efficiently identify the characteristics and contributing factors of common prescribing errors, in a manner useful for targeting quality improvement. Furthermore, this study produced a number of salient findings. First, a narrow range of drugs were implicated in the majority of incidents. Second, a small number of error types were highly recurrent. Lastly, a range of contributing factors were evident, with those related to the working environment contributing to the majority of prescribing errors analysed.


Assuntos
Causalidade , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Gestão de Riscos/métodos , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Erros de Medicação/estatística & dados numéricos , Projetos de Pesquisa , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos
20.
Eur Urol Oncol ; 3(6): 780-783, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32474006

RESUMO

The definition of intraoperative adverse events (IAEs) still lacks standardization, hampering the assessment of surgical performance in this regard. Over the years, efforts to address this issue have been carried out to improve the reporting of outcomes. In 2019, the European Association of Urology (EAU) proposed a standardized reporting tool for IAEs in urology. The objective of the present study is to distill systematically published data on IAEs in patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) for renal masses to answer three key questions (KQs). (KQ1) Which system is used to report the IAEs? (KQ2) What is the frequency of IAEs? (KQ3) What types of IAEs are reported? A comprehensive systematic review of all English-language publications on RPN was carried out. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to evaluate PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases (from January 1, 2000 to January 1, 2019). Quality of reporting and grading complications were assessed according to the EAU recommendations. Globally, 59 (35.3%) and 108 (64.7%) studies reported zero and one or more IAEs, respectively. Overall, 761 (2.6%) patients reported at least one IAE. Intraoperative bleeding is reported as the most common IAE (58%). Our analysis showed no improvement in reporting and grading of IAEs over time. PATIENT SUMMARY: Up to now, an agreement regarding the definition and reporting of intraoperative adverse events (IAEs) in the literature has not been achieved. The aim of this study is to evaluate the reporting of IAEs in patients undergoing robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) after a systematic review of the literature. More rigorous reporting of IAEs during RPN is needed to measure their impact on patients' perioperative care.


Assuntos
Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Nefrectomia/efeitos adversos , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Gestão de Riscos/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Nefrectomia/métodos , Assistência Perioperatória/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Gestão de Riscos/organização & administração , Gestão de Riscos/normas , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...